U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Https

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Jurors'' Judgments About Forensic Identification Evidence

Award Information

Award #
2008-DN-BX-0003
Funding Category
Competitive
Location
Awardee County
Maricopa
Congressional District
Status
Closed
Funding First Awarded
2008
Total funding (to date)
$496,450

Description of original award (Fiscal Year 2008, $496,450)

The impact of forensic science evidence on jurors' judgments is an important emerging question for empirical research on science in the criminal justice system. Unlike DNA evidence, forensic identification evidence (fingerprints, bitemarks, toolmarks, handwriting, footwear impressions,
tire tracks, etc.) draws its strength largely from the subjective judgment of examiners who testify about whether or not questioned crime scene marks and known exemplars share a common origin. Yet remarkably little is known about what factors affect the way jurors think about and
use identification evidence when making their decisions. The proposed study will investigate this issue in a series of realistic yet highly controlled empirical studies with members of the Arizona jury pool in a research program that has two phases. Phase I (Studies 1, 2, and 3) will investigate whether and how jurors' judgments are affected by testimony and judicial instruction pertaining to the reliability of the opinion evidence. Phase II (Studies 4, 5, and 6) will investigate whether and how the evidentiary context in which forensic identification evidence is offered affects jurors' judgments. A subset of studies will be replicated using judges as the research participants. Investigating factors that affect factfinders' use of identification evidence will provide insight into the most effective ways to communicate the value of this evidence in a court of law.
ca/ncf

Date Created: September 17, 2008