Recent developments in forensic science have precipitated a proliferation of methods for quantifying the probative value of evidence by constructing a Bayes Factor that allows a decision-maker to select between the prosecution and defense models. Unfortunately, the analytical form of a Bayes Factor is often computationally intractable. A typical approach in statistics uses Monte Carlo integration to numerically approximate the marginal likelihoods composing the Bayes Factor. The current article describes the derivation of an asymptotic Monte Carlo standard error (MCSE) for the Bayes Factor, and its applicability to quantifying the value of evidence is explored, using a simulation-based example involving a benchmark data set. The simulation also explores the effect of prior choice on the Bayes Factor approximations and corresponding MCSEs. (Publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- The Possible Backfire Effects of Hot Spots Policing: An Experimental Assessment of Impacts on Legitimacy, Fear and Collective Efficacy
- The cross-reactivity of cannabinoid analogs (delta-8-THC, delta-10-THC and CBD), their metabolites and chiral carboxy HHC metabolites in urine of six commercially available homogeneous immunoassays
- Evaluating a Multi-Disciplinary Response to Domestic Violence: The DVERT Program in Colorado Springs