Aviso de archivo
Esta es una página de archivo que ya no se actualiza. Puede contener información desactualizada y es posible que los enlaces ya no funcionen como se pretendía originalmente.
The prosecutor should obtain additional concessions from the defense expert regarding the laboratory where the typing was conducted, certain typing results, and the lab's credentials. Labs accredited by the ASCLD or those that participate in the FBI's CODIS utilize a system of peer review for typing results. Have the defense expert acknowledge the value of such a system of double checking typing results and thus concede the process of DNA analysis used by the lab.
If the prosecutor obtains these concessions, often the only area of disagreement between the experts will be the typing results at one or two loci. The prosecutor should obtain the expert's concession that he agrees with the interpretation at the other 10 or 11 loci and sees nothing which would exclude the defendant as a possible contributor of the DNA.
Additional Online Courses
- What Every First Responding Officer Should Know About DNA Evidence
- Collecting DNA Evidence at Property Crime Scenes
- DNA – A Prosecutor’s Practice Notebook
- Crime Scene and DNA Basics
- Laboratory Safety Programs
- DNA Amplification
- Population Genetics and Statistics
- Non-STR DNA Markers: SNPs, Y-STRs, LCN and mtDNA
- Firearms Examiner Training
- Forensic DNA Education for Law Enforcement Decisionmakers
- What Every Investigator and Evidence Technician Should Know About DNA Evidence
- Principles of Forensic DNA for Officers of the Court
- Law 101: Legal Guide for the Forensic Expert
- Laboratory Orientation and Testing of Body Fluids and Tissues
- DNA Extraction and Quantitation
- STR Data Analysis and Interpretation
- Communication Skills, Report Writing, and Courtroom Testimony
- Español for Law Enforcement
- Amplified DNA Product Separation for Forensic Analysts