Aviso de archivo
Esta es una página de archivo que ya no se actualiza. Puede contener información desactualizada y es posible que los enlaces ya no funcionen como se pretendía originalmente.
Home | Glossary | Resources | Help | Contact Us | Course Map
Introduction to Redirect and Rebuttal
Redirect of the prosecution analyst and rebuttal constitute the prosecutor's opportunity to reaffirm the integrity of the DNA evidence after it has been challenged by the defense. Redirect and rebuttal do not stand alone but accomplish their goals through two primary strategies which are echoed throughout the trial:
- Winning the battle of the evidence:
The prosecution establishes that the state’s DNA analyst is better qualified, trained, and experienced in forensic DNA typing than is the defense expert witness and thus the state’s DNA analyst’s opinion is more credible. - Showing the jury how the DNA evidence proves the prosecution's theory of the case:
The prosecution describes the link between the DNA evidence and the non-DNA evidence and reiterates these links throughout the case.
In this topic you will learn about common defense attacks and the strategies for conducting the redirects and rebuttals.
Too much scientific information presented to the jury too early may have a negative impact on a case.
This could result in the evidentiary significance and impact of the DNA evidence being lost in a flood of scientific terminology and raw data. Several points to keep in mind in the battle between expert witnesses:
- First establish that the state's expert's credentials and training are superior to the defense witness'. Emphasize the state expert's daily work involving forensic DNA testing,
- Second determine whether the defense expert's credentials are the result of nationally recognized training and hands-on forensic testing or merely dues-paying association membership,
- Third, determine whether the defense arguments run counter to authoritative opinions on forensic DNA testing and the consensus of the relevant scientific communities,
- Finally, the prosecutor should demonstrate that the DNA analyst is not just one soldier but an army of scientists.
Additional Online Courses
- What Every First Responding Officer Should Know About DNA Evidence
- Collecting DNA Evidence at Property Crime Scenes
- DNA – A Prosecutor’s Practice Notebook
- Crime Scene and DNA Basics
- Laboratory Safety Programs
- DNA Amplification
- Population Genetics and Statistics
- Non-STR DNA Markers: SNPs, Y-STRs, LCN and mtDNA
- Firearms Examiner Training
- Forensic DNA Education for Law Enforcement Decisionmakers
- What Every Investigator and Evidence Technician Should Know About DNA Evidence
- Principles of Forensic DNA for Officers of the Court
- Law 101: Legal Guide for the Forensic Expert
- Laboratory Orientation and Testing of Body Fluids and Tissues
- DNA Extraction and Quantitation
- STR Data Analysis and Interpretation
- Communication Skills, Report Writing, and Courtroom Testimony
- Español for Law Enforcement
- Amplified DNA Product Separation for Forensic Analysts