NCJ Number
109765
Journal
Adolescence Volume: 22 Issue: 87 Dated: (Fall 1987) Pages: 691-704
Date Published
1987
Length
14 pages
Annotation
This prediction study compared three statistical procedures for accuracy using two assessment methods.
Abstract
The criterion is to return to a juvenile prison after the first release, and the models tested are logit analysis, predictive attribute analysis, and a Burgess procedure. No significant differences are found between statistics in prediction. (Publisher abstract)
Date Published: January 1, 1987
Downloads
No download available
Similar Publications
- Intellectual Ability and Sexual Recidivism Risk Assessment: Comparing Predictive Accuracy in an Incarcerated US Sample
- Does Measurement Matter? Examining the Impact of Outcome Measurement Variation On the Rates and Predictors of Juvenile Recidivism
- The Experiences of Men with Substance Use Disorders Exiting Prison at the Height of the Opioid Crisis