Probabilistic genotyping typically proceeds by first deconvoluting a mixture into separate components and then computing a likelihood ratio for a potential contributor. The typical range of likelihood ratios for contributors and unrelated profiles depends, to a large extent, on how well the mixture is resolved. This in turn depends on the quality and complexity of the sample. Some samples are highly discriminatory while others are likely to yield only inconclusive results. Knowing the power of discrimination is helpful when deciding on whether to proceed with investigating a case or to do potential rework and for deciding on database inclusion. The current article describes the results of several case scenarios, exploring questions such as: Is the profile's minor contributor likely to yield a large likelihood ratio?, Is it feasible to find a donor among a large database of unrelated profiles?, or What is the probability that a brother of a true donor yields a large likelihood ratio?. The efficiency and speed of the method was demonstrated for several examples. (publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Forensic DNA Interpretation and Human Factors: Improving Practice Through a Systems Approach
- Studies on the Formation of N-Methylperfluoroalkylnitrile Cations from Perfluoroacylphenethylamines in Electron Ionisation Mass Spectrometry: Unique Marker Ion Fragments in Methamphetamine Analysis
- The Daunting Task of Strengthening Medical Examiner and Coroner Investigations Across Hundreds of Jurisdictions