In these cases, the Los Angeles Municipal Courts sentenced 55 percent to probation without financial penalties, 23 percent to probation plus financial penalty, 8 percent to jail without financial penalty, and 14 percent to jail plus probation plus financial penalty. Offense was the main determinant of the type of penalty imposed, although offender characteristics of race, educational attainment, and employment status also were related to penalty or combination of penalties used. Overall, about two-thirds of fines and cost-of-probation penalties were paid in full, while 55 percent of restitution charges were paid in full. Prior criminal record and drug problem best predicted postrelease recidivism and nonpayment of fines. Since jailing costs $900 per month, incapacitates only briefly, and criminalizes those not already highly criminalized, it is recommended that a cost-benefit approach to sanctions be used that considers offender criminality and ability to pay, as well nonfinancial penalties such as community service and house arrest. 24 tables and 16 footnotes. (Author abstract modified)
Downloads
Related Datasets
Similar Publications
- Effectiveness of Selective Prosecution By Career Criminal Programs, Final Report
- Low Risk Offenders Under Probation Supervision: Risk Management and the Risk-Needs-Responsivity Framework
- Using Citizen Notification To Interrupt Near-Repeat Residential Burglary Patterns: the Micro-Level Near-Repeat Experiment